How to Navigate Difficult Conversations in Writing
Some conversations
just aren’t easy
Breaking
bad news to someone, finding a respectful way to disagree, asking a favor, or
reviewing a situation that didn’t go well—these are all hard things to do,
perhaps especially when so many conversations now occur in
writing and not face-to-face.
A few
pointers given here if followed can make such writing concise, clear, and
insightful.
Tough
conversations don't have to be so stressful.
Opening the
conversation
Start by
showing empathy while being direct about what’s going on. Without tiptoeing
around the subject, make clear you’ve given thought to how it will land with
the recipient, and that you want to avoid confusion or making things harder.
For example:
When giving
bad news: I’m sorry to have to tell you this, but the repair process will be
more extensive than we’d initially hoped.
It can also
help to make clear at the outset that you’re trying to advance the conversation
toward some kind of resolution, as in the following two examples.
Politely
disagreeing: I appreciate your suggestion, but I think we need a different
solution. (Next, kindly provide specific reasons and alternatives.)
Understanding
mistakes or failures: We received some tough feedback from the client, and we
want to better understand what went wrong and how we can do better.
Plan a few steps
ahead
Try to
think through how the person you’re writing to will react, then prepare
accordingly. What information will they want? What next steps can they
anticipate?
Incorporating
such details into your draft shows you’ve considered their perspective—and it
can provide a useful way to move past the uneasy news or awkward request you
had to deliver higher up.
That said,
if you find your contingencies approaching a level of complexity better suited
to a flowchart, perhaps just keep things short and open-ended, then see which
way the recipient steers the conversation.
Be polite; don’t
hedge
It’s
tempting to soften uncomfortable particulars by hedging with squishy modifiers.
Usually, it’s better to be straightforward with the facts, as your recipient
won’t appreciate you obscuring them behind vague language.
Hedging:
Your ears may differ, but I’m not certain the audio quality of this recording
is quite up to par for our podcast.
Direct:
Unfortunately, the person speaking sounds too far from the mic, and I also hear
a dog barking in the background, so we should re-record this segment.
When
hedging stems from uncertainty, it’s often wise to be direct about what you
don’t know and formulate it as a question:
Asking: Is
it worth trying to re-record so we can get them closer to the mic and cut out
some background noise?
Show you understand
It is
believed that a good writer shows and
doesn’t just tell. And that people appreciate feeling understood, especially
amid tough conversations. So as your back-and-forth progresses, paraphrase the
key points and concrete to-dos so it’s clear you’re reading closely,
understand, and care.
Comments
Post a Comment